law school is not that fun

what is this   but it looks like you're having fun    ask something    submit something

law school is not as fun as you think it is

April 11, 2014 at 1:25am
69 notes
you reinterpret emails from the school about admitted students day in the law school

you reinterpret emails from the school about admitted students day in the law school

April 9, 2014 at 6:37pm
223 notes
Reblogged from lawschoolisnotthatfun
aestheticoflostness:


lawschoolisnotthatfun:

aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

there are evidence questions in the law school

This is actually a hard one. You can’t get it through 404(a) because the defense didn’t open the door. And it is a “wrong” covered under 404(b) so the specific instance can’t be used to show character. Maybe Dumbledore’s testimony came in under 404(b)(2) intending to show absence of mistake or lack of accident, but none of those seem valid to contradict a self defense claim. 
I don’t think 608 is the issue here because it’s about a specific wrong. 
SOMEONE TELL ME THE ANSWER!

This was a 608(b) question. The answer was that extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instance, like you said. You have to take Dumbledore’s word for it.  

Yay! May we both pass evidence with flying A+s based solely on our knowledge of Harry Potter.
Dumbledore’s Evidence Army!

aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

there are evidence questions in the law school

This is actually a hard one. You can’t get it through 404(a) because the defense didn’t open the door. And it is a “wrong” covered under 404(b) so the specific instance can’t be used to show character. Maybe Dumbledore’s testimony came in under 404(b)(2) intending to show absence of mistake or lack of accident, but none of those seem valid to contradict a self defense claim. 

I don’t think 608 is the issue here because it’s about a specific wrong. 

SOMEONE TELL ME THE ANSWER!

This was a 608(b) question. The answer was that extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instance, like you said. You have to take Dumbledore’s word for it.  

Yay! May we both pass evidence with flying A+s based solely on our knowledge of Harry Potter.

Dumbledore’s Evidence Army!

(via aestheticoflawstness)

April 8, 2014 at 3:08pm
223 notes
Reblogged from lawschoolisnotthatfun
aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

there are evidence questions in the law school

This is actually a hard one. You can’t get it through 404(a) because the defense didn’t open the door. And it is a “wrong” covered under 404(b) so the specific instance can’t be used to show character. Maybe Dumbledore’s testimony came in under 404(b)(2) intending to show absence of mistake or lack of accident, but none of those seem valid to contradict a self defense claim. 
I don’t think 608 is the issue here because it’s about a specific wrong. 
SOMEONE TELL ME THE ANSWER!

   This was a 608(b) question. The answer was that extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instance, like you said. You have to take Dumbledore’s word for it.  

aestheticoflostness:

lawschoolisnotthatfun:

there are evidence questions in the law school

This is actually a hard one. You can’t get it through 404(a) because the defense didn’t open the door. And it is a “wrong” covered under 404(b) so the specific instance can’t be used to show character. Maybe Dumbledore’s testimony came in under 404(b)(2) intending to show absence of mistake or lack of accident, but none of those seem valid to contradict a self defense claim. 

I don’t think 608 is the issue here because it’s about a specific wrong. 

SOMEONE TELL ME THE ANSWER!

This was a 608(b) question. The answer was that extrinsic evidence is not admissible to prove specific instance, like you said. You have to take Dumbledore’s word for it.  

(via aestheticoflawstness)

April 2, 2014 at 9:34pm
223 notes
there are evidence questions in the law school

there are evidence questions in the law school

March 28, 2014 at 11:24am
59 notes
we are attractive in the law school

we are attractive in the law school

February 28, 2014 at 11:24pm
71 notes
Reblogged from nottreason
cephalopodvictorious:

cursewordssandcupcakes:

nottreason:

So Business Law is going well.

This is exactly how I take notes… When I actually take notes that is.

I’m unreasonably glad I’m not the only one who does this

people take notes in the law school

cephalopodvictorious:

cursewordssandcupcakes:

nottreason:

So Business Law is going well.

This is exactly how I take notes… When I actually take notes that is.

I’m unreasonably glad I’m not the only one who does this

people take notes in the law school

February 13, 2014 at 4:27pm
4 notes
sophie was a bitch in the law school

sophie was a bitch in the law school

January 29, 2014 at 4:48pm
3 notes

this morning on my way to school i saw pages of a brief scattered in the snow and my fingers were too frozen to take a pic 

January 26, 2014 at 5:41pm
23 notes
you deal with half-bloods in the law school

you deal with half-bloods in the law school

December 5, 2013 at 6:46pm
9 notes
Reblogged from lizhugstrees
lizhugstrees:

Valuable advice from my PR notes.

you learn stuff in the law school

lizhugstrees:

Valuable advice from my PR notes.

you learn stuff in the law school